| Home — Hejmen | Up — Supren | Back — Reen | Next — Sekven |
The correlatives, called tabelvortoj (table-words) in Esperanto, are a fixed set of extremely common words whose English equivalents are of various parts of speech. These act like various parts of speech, mostly adverbs.
The basic meaning is expressed in the first part of the word, and the last part gives it its grammatical category.
These words can begin with any of the following parts:
The endings can be any of the following:
By combining one of the five beginnings and one of the nine endings, you can get any of forty-five words (some of which can take additional endings).
The −o words are rather abstract nouns, and do not modify other words. So tio means “that”, in the sense of “that thing that I am pointing at”, or “that idea which you have just mentioned”. Examples:
Ordinarily, these words do not have plurals, so we don’t ask, «Kioj estas tioj?», meaning, “What are those things?” They do take the −n ending for accusative case, when appropriate: «Kion vi faras?» “What are you doing?”
A −u word always modifies some other word, though that word may not always be actually expressed. Examples:
This single illustration should point out the difference between an −o word and a −u word with no noun following. If there are a bunch of books on the table, and you have been discussing them, you could ask, «Kiun vi desiras?» “Which [one] do you want?” If you ask simply, «Kion vi desiras?», you’re being more open-ended, and asking “What do you want?”, not limiting the answer to one of the books under discussion.
Very often, a −u word refers to a person, and there is seldom an actual noun following it. Examples:
These words act like adjectives, so they can take both the plural and accusative endings.
The −a words express kind or type. Examples:
These words act like adjectives, so they can take both the plural and accusative endings.
These denote possession. Examples:
These words behave like adjectives, but do not take adjective endings.
These denote location. With an −n ending, they denote destination.
Correlatives ending with «−EL»
These words denote manner. Examples:
Correlatives ending with «−AL»
These words denote reason:
Correlatives ending with «−AM»
These words denote time:
Correlatives ending with «−OM»
These words denote quantity:
These words are often followed by the preposition da, and there is some controversy over whether the pair of words, kiom da, constitutes an adverb and a preposition, so the word modified should not have the −n ending, or a single adverb, so the word should have the ending if the phrase is used as the object of a verb. So in asking, “How much money do you have?”, some will ask, «Kiom da mono vi havas?», and others, «Kiom da monon vi havas?» I would prefer simply «Kiom monon vi havas?»
Note that there are no correlatives that mean “this”. For these, we use a ti− word, and put the particle ĉi either before or after it. Some people hyphenate this word in, giving ĉi−tie or tie−ĉi (here), but officially, this is an error.
It is possible to put the particle for after a ti− word to indicate remoteness: tie for (way over yonder), but this usage is rare.
The particle ajn adds emphasis, generally emphatic uncertainty:
Questions or suggestions? Please write, and I’ll get back to you.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |